go2roomshare
02-01 01:04 PM
why this thread is still active? should be closed
wallpaper kristen stewart wallpapers
sanjay
07-10 04:44 PM
Visa Bulletin
Number 108
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.
The Visa Bulletin for July 2007, posted on June 12, must be read in conjunction with the Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2.
The Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2, must be read in conjunction with the Visa Bulletin for July 2007, which was posted on June 12.
In put by Krupa:
=============
Why DOS issued the above mentioned new bulletin on 9th July 2007 ?
What is the legal implications before and after issuing this bulletin ?
Any one can update this thread please?
Instead of update, I request mod's to close this thread. Krupa, just browse this site and you will find more than 4 or 5 threads already open on this topic. Does it makes any sense opening a new thread for each and every doubt you get regarding VB? Let's keep this site clean with minimum threads else our site will go blogs way, with no content and no fizz.
Number 108
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.
The Visa Bulletin for July 2007, posted on June 12, must be read in conjunction with the Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2.
The Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2, must be read in conjunction with the Visa Bulletin for July 2007, which was posted on June 12.
In put by Krupa:
=============
Why DOS issued the above mentioned new bulletin on 9th July 2007 ?
What is the legal implications before and after issuing this bulletin ?
Any one can update this thread please?
Instead of update, I request mod's to close this thread. Krupa, just browse this site and you will find more than 4 or 5 threads already open on this topic. Does it makes any sense opening a new thread for each and every doubt you get regarding VB? Let's keep this site clean with minimum threads else our site will go blogs way, with no content and no fizz.
pcs
01-25 10:00 PM
AP means, he is pre authorized to come back. Talk to some guys & wait to see some more replies at thou is forum. Ask your friend to block seats till you get more clarity.
Best of luck.....
By the way, pease stay active with IV & help our / your cause by getting more active members & contributions
Best of luck.....
By the way, pease stay active with IV & help our / your cause by getting more active members & contributions
2011 wallpaper Kristen Stewart HD
srikondoji
04-11 09:36 PM
Now. Don't try to scream.
This is just unofficial and don't ask my sources.
All i know is that as of yesterday there were only 18000 applications for Masters quota.
Why did not they get filled as fast as the Regular quota?
This is the reasoning my lawyer gave....
"Most of the applicants for Master's quota were in confusion after April 3 after reading several bulletins about 200,000 or so H1-B applications. And some people didn't even apply thinking that the USCIS may have received more than enough master's quota applications even though the bulletin said that they were accepting more applications for Master's quota."
I know of people who have submitted fresh H1-B applications under master's quota as late as April 7th.
So guys, wait for the official numbers. Don't believe me. But do compare when the official news is released.
I am surprised by the slow pace of Master's applications.
This is just unofficial and don't ask my sources.
All i know is that as of yesterday there were only 18000 applications for Masters quota.
Why did not they get filled as fast as the Regular quota?
This is the reasoning my lawyer gave....
"Most of the applicants for Master's quota were in confusion after April 3 after reading several bulletins about 200,000 or so H1-B applications. And some people didn't even apply thinking that the USCIS may have received more than enough master's quota applications even though the bulletin said that they were accepting more applications for Master's quota."
I know of people who have submitted fresh H1-B applications under master's quota as late as April 7th.
So guys, wait for the official numbers. Don't believe me. But do compare when the official news is released.
I am surprised by the slow pace of Master's applications.
more...
chris
11-15 12:07 AM
My PD is current for 12 months (from Oct 2007) .
Today i got reply for my June 2008 service request, saying my back ground check is not cleared :mad:
I know from Infopass that my NC is cleared long back.:)
If your PD is not current cant do any thing but PD is current, contact your local congressman.
Hi All,
I opened a service request with USCIS when my I485 was current in 09/08 and i got response saying that still investigation into my background remains open, so the case is not yet ready for decision. I filed my I 485 in August 2005 and in july 2007(then my file was current) also i was told that the background check is still going on.
Now we know that if it has been more than 180 days after we file I485, no need to wait for background check to process the petetion. My intention is to get my file out of this loop by the time PD becomes current. If any one had this issue and got it resolved, please advise me how i can handle it.
Thanks.
Today i got reply for my June 2008 service request, saying my back ground check is not cleared :mad:
I know from Infopass that my NC is cleared long back.:)
If your PD is not current cant do any thing but PD is current, contact your local congressman.
Hi All,
I opened a service request with USCIS when my I485 was current in 09/08 and i got response saying that still investigation into my background remains open, so the case is not yet ready for decision. I filed my I 485 in August 2005 and in july 2007(then my file was current) also i was told that the background check is still going on.
Now we know that if it has been more than 180 days after we file I485, no need to wait for background check to process the petetion. My intention is to get my file out of this loop by the time PD becomes current. If any one had this issue and got it resolved, please advise me how i can handle it.
Thanks.
bombaysardar
08-01 09:18 PM
What is interesting in this? This is not interesting, this is published guideline from USCIS. But the outcome is not guaranteed to get an EAD.
Many of the users may not be aware of this feature - thanks for flagging it 'jazzbythebay':)
Many of the users may not be aware of this feature - thanks for flagging it 'jazzbythebay':)
more...
abrahamL
03-19 05:11 PM
Hi,
I was let go by my company and am still under payroll for another month. I am told that once I am off the payroll, the company has to tell the lawyer to cancel my H1B.
Is there anyway that I could extend my H1B for a smooth H1B transfer to a new company? as I am still looking for a good offer at this stage.
And how long does it take for the government to process the cancellation of the H1B? And during that process if another company comes in and is willing to sponsor, would that be a smooth process?
Thanks!
Abraham
I was let go by my company and am still under payroll for another month. I am told that once I am off the payroll, the company has to tell the lawyer to cancel my H1B.
Is there anyway that I could extend my H1B for a smooth H1B transfer to a new company? as I am still looking for a good offer at this stage.
And how long does it take for the government to process the cancellation of the H1B? And during that process if another company comes in and is willing to sponsor, would that be a smooth process?
Thanks!
Abraham
2010 kristen stewart wallpaper
wandmaker
11-01 07:01 PM
Isnt the three year extension valid only if you cannot file your I-485 because of retrogression? Once you file your 485, you get only a year?
1. Labor Pending for > 365 days = 1 year H1 extension
2. 140 Approved AND 485 Filed & Pending AND Priority Dates Current = 1 year H1 extension
3. 140 Approved AND Priority Dates NOT Current = 3 year H1 extension
4. 140 Approved AND 485 Filed & Pending AND Priority Dates NOT Current = 3 year H1 extension
I guess, you will be #4
1. Labor Pending for > 365 days = 1 year H1 extension
2. 140 Approved AND 485 Filed & Pending AND Priority Dates Current = 1 year H1 extension
3. 140 Approved AND Priority Dates NOT Current = 3 year H1 extension
4. 140 Approved AND 485 Filed & Pending AND Priority Dates NOT Current = 3 year H1 extension
I guess, you will be #4
more...
neo_ny
10-31 06:36 PM
Hello All - I understand from the website that the people already working in the US qualify for an emergency appointment if they are returning back to work in the US. Does anyone if this rule is also applicable it is the first time you are getting a H1-B visa stamp? I got a COS and am planning to get a stamp in December. I know that more dates are available now .. but was wondering if the need arises will I eligible for emergency appointment?
Thanks!
Neo
Thanks!
Neo
hair hair Kristen Stewart hot
frostrated
10-26 02:10 PM
All,
I am currently unemployed and my spouse needs to travel to Mumbai urgently. Our AP is valid through November 30, 2009. Will there be any issues for my wife when she comes back - possibly because of my current status. Wife is employed (with a different company)& the EAD/AP was filed by my last employer. Responses will be appreciated. Thanks!
an EAD requires a sponsoring company. So, it is in your best interest to find an employer immediately and apply for AC21. If at the time of renewal they ask for employer documents, then your renewal will not be processed and your EAD/AP withdrawn.
I am currently unemployed and my spouse needs to travel to Mumbai urgently. Our AP is valid through November 30, 2009. Will there be any issues for my wife when she comes back - possibly because of my current status. Wife is employed (with a different company)& the EAD/AP was filed by my last employer. Responses will be appreciated. Thanks!
an EAD requires a sponsoring company. So, it is in your best interest to find an employer immediately and apply for AC21. If at the time of renewal they ask for employer documents, then your renewal will not be processed and your EAD/AP withdrawn.
more...
snathan
08-10 10:25 PM
Hello
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
You started you GC as future employement with company A. You never joined them and want to use AC-21 which will raise red flag. So you need to need to very careful.
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
You started you GC as future employement with company A. You never joined them and want to use AC-21 which will raise red flag. So you need to need to very careful.
hot hot Kristen Stewart Wallpapers
laststraw
04-15 12:26 PM
Here is my estimate on the timeframe:
Prepare job description etc. - 1 to 2 months (depends on company and attorney)
Prevailing Wages - 2 months (this is based on the current centralized processing)
Recruitment Process - 2 to 3 months (depends on company and attorney)
PERM Labor approval - 9 months (if it gets audited, it would take around 2 years)
I140 - 4 months (you can reduce it if you can file premium processing)
I485 - This depends on the EB category & VISA dates - if it is EB3 India, it would probably be 7-10 years or more
I am not trying to be pessimistic. This is based on what I have observed and read. I have been in this country for 10 years on H1B. I am currently waiting for my Prevailing Wages request to be processes (for my 3rd labor application). It is a long process, but as long as you are working for a good company that treats you well, you should be able to endure the pain.
Prepare job description etc. - 1 to 2 months (depends on company and attorney)
Prevailing Wages - 2 months (this is based on the current centralized processing)
Recruitment Process - 2 to 3 months (depends on company and attorney)
PERM Labor approval - 9 months (if it gets audited, it would take around 2 years)
I140 - 4 months (you can reduce it if you can file premium processing)
I485 - This depends on the EB category & VISA dates - if it is EB3 India, it would probably be 7-10 years or more
I am not trying to be pessimistic. This is based on what I have observed and read. I have been in this country for 10 years on H1B. I am currently waiting for my Prevailing Wages request to be processes (for my 3rd labor application). It is a long process, but as long as you are working for a good company that treats you well, you should be able to endure the pain.
more...
house pictures Kristen-Stewart Wallpapers. kristen stewart wallpapers widescreen.
gcformeornot
03-11 10:56 AM
not counting the derivatives towards visa count. That would littlerly eliminate backlogs....
tattoo Kristen Stewart Wallpaper 2 by
adhantari
06-16 03:26 PM
6 to 1...... maybe L1 guys don't visit this forum since they already got thier GCs....:rolleyes:
H1 loosers still hanging here.....
H1 loosers still hanging here.....
more...
pictures Kristen Stewart wallpaper
snathan
01-16 10:24 PM
hello all,
Has anyone in Charlotte, NC got a extension on the Driver's license on the basis on the H1-B renewal application receipt.
My spouse's driver's license expires this month end. I have applied for h1-b/h4 renewal, yet to receive the application receipt.But wanted to know if anyone here in Charlotte,NC got a extension/grace (30days or 90days) on the basis of the receipt.
thanks.
In Dallas I couldnt get based on the receipt. They asked me the I-94. But it was for the H4.
Has anyone in Charlotte, NC got a extension on the Driver's license on the basis on the H1-B renewal application receipt.
My spouse's driver's license expires this month end. I have applied for h1-b/h4 renewal, yet to receive the application receipt.But wanted to know if anyone here in Charlotte,NC got a extension/grace (30days or 90days) on the basis of the receipt.
thanks.
In Dallas I couldnt get based on the receipt. They asked me the I-94. But it was for the H4.
dresses hair Kristen Stewart HD
sts_seeker
06-04 05:42 PM
Dear Experts I need this suggestion ASAP to prove I-140 ability to pay.
My Priority Date EB3 is Apr, 2004 and Company is in Loss for '04,'05 and '06 and so can't prove Net assets is greater than liablities or revenue is greater than proffered wage. However Company recently has been approved for line of credit which is greater than(>) the proferred wage.
The only way to show the ablity to pay is by showing the w2 that I have been paid the proffered wage since the priority date which is April 04. But I did not work from Jan'04 though mid of '05 because of health reason. During that time, I was paid by the disability insurance from the employer and I paid the tax for disability income while filing the W-2.
After I joined back on mid on '05 I have been paid more than proferred wage till present(June'07).
Does that satisfy the USCIS of the requirement of ability to pay or Not???
I need help ASAP.
Thanks everyone
My Priority Date EB3 is Apr, 2004 and Company is in Loss for '04,'05 and '06 and so can't prove Net assets is greater than liablities or revenue is greater than proffered wage. However Company recently has been approved for line of credit which is greater than(>) the proferred wage.
The only way to show the ablity to pay is by showing the w2 that I have been paid the proffered wage since the priority date which is April 04. But I did not work from Jan'04 though mid of '05 because of health reason. During that time, I was paid by the disability insurance from the employer and I paid the tax for disability income while filing the W-2.
After I joined back on mid on '05 I have been paid more than proferred wage till present(June'07).
Does that satisfy the USCIS of the requirement of ability to pay or Not???
I need help ASAP.
Thanks everyone
more...
makeup makeup kristen stewart hot
ski_dude12
10-21 11:54 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/10/21/india.space/index.html
girlfriend hot Kristen Stewart kristen
h1bdude1
03-26 12:39 PM
thank you for your reply.
but i read somewhere that its better to send chest X-Ray Report with I-693 so that USCIS will not get any excuse to send RFE in the future.
Physician will advise you if a chest X-Ray is needed.
but i read somewhere that its better to send chest X-Ray Report with I-693 so that USCIS will not get any excuse to send RFE in the future.
Physician will advise you if a chest X-Ray is needed.
hairstyles 2011 Kristen Stewart
pappu
05-01 12:17 PM
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070501/NEWS01/70501019
check it out.......
reporter contact Pleeeeeeeez
You can find it if you spend a minute extra on the site and look at the contact us page.
Niraj Warikoo, Reporter, nwarikoo [at] freepress.com
check it out.......
reporter contact Pleeeeeeeez
You can find it if you spend a minute extra on the site and look at the contact us page.
Niraj Warikoo, Reporter, nwarikoo [at] freepress.com
looneytunezez
11-10 03:17 PM
what do you want? if he/she wants to apply for tourist visa, then it supposes that the purpose should be tourism....
do you or your friend intend to lie and/or cheat on your application or intentions?
wanna apply for a visit visa or tourist visa
do you or your friend intend to lie and/or cheat on your application or intentions?
wanna apply for a visit visa or tourist visa
guy03062
07-06 02:42 PM
07/06/2007: Hard Working Women and Men in USCIS Behind the Visa Number Fiasco
From the information available thus far, this reporter believes that no one in the agencies intended to bring about this fiasco. It was lack of close communication and coordination between the USCIS and the DOS and more or less a poor handling of the situation at some level within the USCIS. The people should remember that there are many and many women and men in the agency involved who worked hard just like you and me to do the given jobs, including managers, supervisors, and other higher ups. The agencies should take this fiasco as a good opportunity to learn a lesson on what could go wrong in the management of immigration services and responsibilities affecting hundreds and thousands of other human beings. This reporter has been visiting the field offices, particularly Nebraska Service Center and other local field offices, almost every single year for over past 20 years and have met the "human" faces of hard working officers and other workers working in tiny cubicles and facilities that cannot be described as fancy offices but more or less factories and plants. When I report the current news, this reporter sees the faces of the women and men that I have met who worked in the not necessarily fit office space and environment. Without doubt, the current fiasco should be one way or another corrected and prevented in the future. However, the people should not take this opportunity to dehumanize the current event and easily demonize other people with no faces. Probably this is the time when these women and men need most an emotional support and boost from their invisible customers. After all, things will go through the legal process or other processes to correct the mistake. Low morale of these women and men will help no purposes and causes. On behalf of our readers, we want to send a big "CHEER UP" to these women and men!
Source:- http://www.immigration-law.com/
From the information available thus far, this reporter believes that no one in the agencies intended to bring about this fiasco. It was lack of close communication and coordination between the USCIS and the DOS and more or less a poor handling of the situation at some level within the USCIS. The people should remember that there are many and many women and men in the agency involved who worked hard just like you and me to do the given jobs, including managers, supervisors, and other higher ups. The agencies should take this fiasco as a good opportunity to learn a lesson on what could go wrong in the management of immigration services and responsibilities affecting hundreds and thousands of other human beings. This reporter has been visiting the field offices, particularly Nebraska Service Center and other local field offices, almost every single year for over past 20 years and have met the "human" faces of hard working officers and other workers working in tiny cubicles and facilities that cannot be described as fancy offices but more or less factories and plants. When I report the current news, this reporter sees the faces of the women and men that I have met who worked in the not necessarily fit office space and environment. Without doubt, the current fiasco should be one way or another corrected and prevented in the future. However, the people should not take this opportunity to dehumanize the current event and easily demonize other people with no faces. Probably this is the time when these women and men need most an emotional support and boost from their invisible customers. After all, things will go through the legal process or other processes to correct the mistake. Low morale of these women and men will help no purposes and causes. On behalf of our readers, we want to send a big "CHEER UP" to these women and men!
Source:- http://www.immigration-law.com/
0 comments:
Post a Comment